Paws
Home Contact Us Site Map Search MVMA Member Login
About MVMA
Directions and Map to MVMA
Get A Vet
CE Calendar
Disaster Response
Annual Convention
2010 Exhibitor Prospectus
2009 Sponsorship Opportunities
Volunteer
Opportunities
Public
News
*includes update on H1N1
Government Affairs
Foundation
Academy of Veterinary Medical Practice
Vet Tech Info
Memorials and Updates
Classified Ads
MVMA Career Center
Veterinary Career Network

 

            FELINE BARTONELLA INFECTIONS – Separating Fact from Fiction©2006

 

Alice M. Wolf, DVM, DACVIM, DABVP

Chief Consultant:  Veterinary Information Network

Adjunct Professor, Department of Small Animal Veterinary Clinical Sciences

College of Veterinary Medicine, Texas A&M University

College Station, TX   77843-4474

 

Introduction

            Bartonella spp. cause cat scratch disease (CSD) and other clinical syndromes in human beings, and are an important cause of endocarditis in dogs.  On the other hand, there is scant documented scientific evidence that Bartonella infection causes overt clinical disease in naturally infected cats, in spite of a high prevalence of bacteremia and seropositivity in areas of the United States with warm temperatures and high humidity. 

 

Microbiology

            Bartonella spp. are facultatively intracellular gram-negative rods that are related closely to Brucella spp and the rickettsiae.  Their intra-erythrocytic location precludes easy blood culture and a reliable response to antimicrobial therapy.

 

            Four species of Bartonella have been shown to infect pet cats.  B. henselae infection is most common, and is the most important cause of CSD.  B. clarridgeiae may be responsible for a small number of cases of CSD.  Rare infections of cats with B. koehlerae and B. bovis also have been reported.  Two main genotypes of Bartonella henselae have been identified worldwide – Houston and Marseille.  A third genotype, Berlin, has only been identified from one cat in Germany.  Exotic cats have also been found to carry Bartonella sp. including:  mountain lions, cheetahs, African lions, Florida panthers, pumas, and bobcats.

 

Transmission

            Bartonella spp. are transmitted between cats by Ctenocephalides felis – the cat flea.  Fleas ingest the organism during a blood meal from a bacteremic cat, and infect a naïve cat through regurgitation of infected saliva during a subsequent blood meal.  Ticks may transmit the organism rarely between cats, and are the primary mode of transmission of Bartonella spp. between dogs.  The organisms are not transmitted between cats by fighting, grooming, mating, or in-utero.

 

            Human beings become infected with Bartonella spp. when flea feces from a bacteremic cat are inoculated into a cat scratch.  Although not confirmed, rarely, infection may possibly be acquired directly through the bite of an infected flea.

 

Cats at Risk

            Although Bartonella infections in cats have only been reported in the modern veterinary literature since 1992, the organism has apparently been infecting and adapting to cats for hundreds of years.  A recent paper reports the isolation of Bartonella antigen from dental pulp by PCR assay in 800 year-old cat teeth from France. The prevalence of bacteremia and seropositivity in cats in the United States is highest in regions that favor the reproduction and persistence of fleas.  Rates are highest in the southeastern United States (up to 40%), and lowest in the northern tier of states.   The incidence in the EU, UK, and other countries also mirrors this pattern with higher seroprevalence rates in warm, moist locales, and much lower rates in colder climes.

 

            Bacteremia is more likely to occur in cats with fleas, free-roaming cats, young cats, and those from multiple-cat populations.

 


Pathogenesis

            After experimental inoculation into Bartonella-naïve cats, the organisms infect erythrocytes and the initial bacteremia lasts 2 to 32 weeks.  After this, infected cats undergo bouts of cyclic bacteremia.  Between bacteremic phases, when blood cultures (and blood PCR tests) are negative, the organisms may persist in endothelial cells, lymph nodes, or the central nervous system.

 

            Following initial production of anti-Bartonella IgM antibody, IgG antibody is produced and remains detectable for months to years.  There is no evidence that the height of the IgG antibody titer correlates with the presence of bacteremia – this observation is important when considering the diagnostic utility of antibody titers.

 

Clinical Signs – Experimental Infections

            Part of the confusion about the clinical importance of Bartonella infections in cats arises from the observation that clinical signs are more likely to occur in cats after experimental inoculation that in naturally infected cats.  Inappropriate extrapolation of data from experimental studies is one of many factors that have led to an overdiagnosis of clinical bartonellosis in the general cat population.

 

            Following experimental inoculation, some infected cats have developed an inflammatory lesion at the injection site, mild generalized lymphadenopathy, splenomegaly, fever, lethargy, anorexia, myalgia, behavioral or neurologic changes, and reproductive abnormalities.  In a number of other studies, no clinical signs were seen following infection.  This probably relates to variable pathogenicity among the strains of B. henselae used in these studies.

 

Clinical Signs – Natural Infections

            With rare exception, Bartonella spp. cause prolonged asymptomatic infections in naturally infected cats.  Well-documented clinical signs arising directly from infection are very unusual and mostly anecdotal.

 

            Bartonella spp. have been linked directly with endocarditis in one cat.  Based on anecdotal reports, the organism may be a rare cause of lymphoplasmacytic gingivostomatitis (LPG) and uveitis.  Clinicians should remember that feline calicivirus and plaque intolerance are very common causes of chronic LPG, and that many affected cats coincidentally will be Bartonella-seropositive given the high prevalence of infection with the organism. 

 

A similar situation arises with uveitis, which usually is caused by viral or fungal infections.  Because uveitis often is accompanied by intra-ocular bleeding, the isolation of Bartonella organisms or antibody from within the eye does not confirm infection.  The diagnosis of Bartonella-induced uveitis is supported by the exclusion of all other more common causes, the demonstration of higher antibody levels in the aqueous humor than in serum, and a specific response to selective antimicrobial treatment.

 

Recent studies by Dr. Mike Lappin and the infectious disease group at Colorado State University have shown no statistical differences in Bartonella seropositivity between cats with and without uveitis, oral cavity disease, and central nervous system disease (ACVIM 2005).

 

Bartonella Infections in Human Beings

            The CDC estimates that there are 24,000 cases of CSD/year in the U.S.  This is an incidence of 9.3/10,000 ambulatory patients/year.  The seropositivity rate for Bartonella in humans is between 3.6% to 15%; with the latter value occurring in a survey of veterinary professionals.  Most persons inoculated accidentally with infected fleas feces through a cat scratch probably show no clinical signs or suffer from a vague, mild self-resolving, flu-like illness that does not prompt a visit to the physician.  On the other hand, some immunocompetent people will develop typical CSD, with or without systemic complications.  Persons with impaired immune systems are at risk for more severe complications of infection.

 

            Typical signs of CSD include the development of a pustule (primary inoculation lesion) in the infected scratch within 7 to 10 days of the injury.  Regional lymphadenitis, usually non-painful, occurs within 1 to 3 weeks of the injury.  Lymph node enlargement may persist for weeks to months.  Antimicrobial treatment does not shorten the duration of disease reliably.

 

            Atypical signs of CSD include Parinaud’s oculoglandular syndrome (associated with a primary inoculation lesion on the conjunctiva and regional lymphadenopathy following infection of the conjunctiva with flea feces from a bacteremic cat), relapsing bacteremias and fevers, encephalitis, endocarditis, hepatitis, pneumonia, and osteomyelitis.

 

            Angioproliferative lesions are more common in immunocompromised persons and include cutaneous lesions of bacillary angiomatosis, and cystic hepatic lesions of bacillary peliosis.  Systemic complications of zoonotic Bartonella infections are more likely to be severe in immunocompromised human patients.  Paradoxically, the response of these patients to antimicrobial treatment is better than that of immunocompetent patients with typical CSD.

           

Diagnosis

            Laboratory tests to detect or exclude infection with Bartonella spp in cats include the detection of anti-Bartonella antibodies through immunofluorescent antibody (IFA) and Western Blot (WB) tests, blood cultures, and the amplification of Bartonella DNA by polymerase chain reaction (PCR) tests.  These tests are used to place cats into one of the following categories:

 

1.       Healthy cats that are not infected with Bartonella spp., and therefore are safe companion animals for immunocompromised persons.

2.       Healthy cats that currently are infected with Bartonella spp., or that have been infected previously with Bartonella spp.

3.       Sick cats (for example, cats with uveitis or stomatitis) with concurrent Bartonella infection that is not the cause of their clinical illness.

4.       Cats with Bartonella-induced illness (an unusual occurrence in clinical practice).

 

Because of the high prevalence of seropositivity to Bartonella in the general cat population and the low incidence of Bartonella-induced disease, the detection of serum antibodies has a poor predictive value (42 to 46 per cent) for the confirmation of disease caused by the organism.  Similarly, using the IFA test, there is a poor correlation between the height of the antibody titer and the ability to detect bacteremia.  Because titers in infected cats vary greatly over time, increases in titers associated with vague clinical signs should be interpreted with caution.

 

Conversely, a negative IFA titer has a high negative predictive value (>90 per cent), making it a useful screening test to exclude bacteremia in an asymptomatic or symptomatic cat.  A small number of cats may be seronegative between cycles of bacteremia, and blood cultures and PCR tests may be needed to confirm the status of these cats, especially if they are being considered as companion animals for immunocompromised persons.

 

With the possible exception of endocarditis, the clinical diseases attributed anecdotally to infection with Bartonella spp. usually are caused by more common infections.  Therefore, tests for these other diseases (for example, FeLV/FIV, toxoplasmosis, cryptococcosis, histoplasmosis, and the aforementioned causes of stomatitis) should be performed and interpreted before tests for Bartonella infection are ordered.

 

Based on our present scientific knowledge of the epidemiology of Bartonella infections in cats and human beings, there are no valid indications for the routine testing and subsequent treatment of healthy pet cats that live with healthy owners.  This recommendation is also that of the Centers for Disease Control and this information is available on their website: www.cdc.org

 

Treatment

            Treatment should be reserved for that small group of sick cats with apparent Bartonella-induced disease, based on careful interpretation of serological and culture/PCR results and an exhaustive exclusion of other more common diseases. At the present time, there is no evidence that antimicrobial therapy eradicates Bartonella organisms completely from infected cats.  Although the level of bacteremia may be reduced temporarily, recurrence of bacteremia usually occurs due to the intra-erythrocytic location of the organism. 

 

            Enrofloxacin and doxycycline have been used to reduce the level of bacteremia.  Unfortunately, the recommended dose of enrofloxacin has a high risk of inducing retinotoxicity, precluding its safe use in cats.  Azithromycin (5-10 mg/kg PO q24h for 5d, then q48h for 40d) has been recommended for anecdotal cases of stomatitis that were suspected to be caused by Bartonella infection.  Unfortunately, because bacteremia is cyclic, and because organisms are rarely cleared with antibiotic therapy, there is no good endpoint on which to base apparent success of treatment.  PCR testing may be negative at some point, and then return to positive weeks to months later.  Antibodies will persist for years, often at high levels even after organisms are gone.

 

Prevention

            Prevention of CSD in human beings sharing a house with cats depends primarily on scrupulous and effective flea control.  Even if the cat is bacteremic, human infection from cat scratches will not occur unless the injuries are contaminated with flea feces.  Children, who are at most risk for the development of CSD if infected, should be taught to play gently with their pet cats, especially new kittens, to avoid scratches.

 

            Cats being considered as companion animals for immunocompromised persons should be selected from a flea-free background.  The cats should be screened initially with an IFA test.  If the test is positive, it would be wise to consider the cat no further as a safe companion.  If the IFA test is negative, blood cultures and PCR tests should be performed.  If these latter tests are negative, the cat can be considered safe, as long as it is kept indoors exclusively, not exposed to cats with fleas, and is treated diligently with a year-round flea-control program.

 

References

 

  1. Pressler B: Bartonellosis. In August JR (ed): Consultations in Feline Internal Medicine, vol 5.  St. Louis, Elsevier, 2006, in press.
  2. Chomel BB, Boulouis HJ, Breitschwerdt EB: Cat scratch disease and other zoonotic Bartonella infections.  J Am Vet Med Assoc 224:1270-1279, 2004.
  3. Guptill L: The diagnosis and treatment of Bartonella in dogs and cats. Proc ACVIM Forum, Charlotte NC, 2003.
  4. Kumasaka K, et al:  Survey of veterinary professionals for antibodies to Bartonella henselae in Japan.  Rinsho Byori, 49:906-910, 2001.
  5. Rolain JM, et al:  Immunofluorescent detection of intraerythrocytic Bartonella henselae in naturally infected cats.  J Clin Microbiol  39:2978-2980, 2001
  6. Jacomo V, Kelly PJ, Raoult D:  Natural history of Bartonella infections (an exception to Koch’s postulate).  Clin Diag Lab Immunol   9:8-18, 2002
  7. Yamamoto K, et al:  Experimental infection of domestic cats with Bartonella koehlerae and comparison of protein and DNA profiles with those of other Bartonella species infecting cats.  J Clin Microbiol  40:466-474, 2002
  8. La VD, et al:  Molecular detection of Bartonella henselae DNA in the dental pulp of 800-year-old French cats.  Clin Infec Dis  39:1391-1394, 2004.